華北地區(qū)極端降水變化特征及多模式模擬評(píng)估
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡(jiǎn)介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號(hào):

基金項(xiàng)目:


Characteristics of Extreme Precipitation and Its MultiModel Simulation Evaluation in North China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問(wèn)統(tǒng)計(jì)
  • |
  • 參考文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 相似文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 引證文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評(píng)論
    摘要:

    利用1961—2010年華北地區(qū)68個(gè)臺(tái)站逐日降水?dāng)?shù)據(jù)計(jì)算了6個(gè)極端降水指數(shù),對(duì)華北極端降水的時(shí)空變化特征進(jìn)行了分析。進(jìn)一步評(píng)估了CMIP5的31個(gè)全球氣候模式對(duì)華北地區(qū)極端降水的模擬效果。結(jié)果表明:①華北地區(qū)極端降水指數(shù)具有較大地區(qū)性差異,平均日降水強(qiáng)度、極端降水閾值等指標(biāo)東南高西北低,大雨日數(shù)和連續(xù)干日東西分布差異明顯。6個(gè)極端降水指標(biāo)的年際變化顯示華北地區(qū)強(qiáng)降水事件增多的同時(shí),極端干旱程度加劇。②CMIP5模式對(duì)華北地區(qū)極端降水指數(shù)的模擬差異較大,其中對(duì)平均日降水強(qiáng)度和極端降水閾值空間分布模擬能力較好,有1/3模式的空間相關(guān)系數(shù)超過(guò)了06。同一模式對(duì)不同指數(shù)的模擬能力也存在較大的差異。③模式模擬相關(guān)系數(shù)和均方根誤差有較好的一致性,根據(jù)這兩個(gè)指標(biāo)分別得到兩組模式排序,其相關(guān)系數(shù)超過(guò)了04。HadGEM2CC,HadGEM2ES,MIROC4h,MIROC5以及CCSM4是模擬華北地區(qū)極端指數(shù)最好的5個(gè)全球模式。相比于多模式集合平均,優(yōu)選模式集合能夠顯著降低模擬的濕偏差。

    Abstract:

    Based on the daily precipitation from observation stations in North China from 1961 to 2010, six extreme precipitation indexes are calculated and their spatial and temporal variation characteristics are analyzed. The simulated capability of global climate models which from CMIP5 on the extreme precipitation are further evaluated. The results are as follows: (1)The extreme precipitation indexes in North China show large regional differences. The values are high in south and low in north of North China for precipitation intensity and extreme precipitation thresholds. The rain days and continuous dry days are different between east and west of North China. The interannual variability of extreme precipitation indexes has a drying trend, and the intensity of extreme events is increasing at the same time. (2)There are differences between the global climate models of CMIP5 for simulating North China extreme precipitation index. The spatial distribution of precipitation intensity and extreme precipitation threshold have a better performance in the models. The pattern correlation coefficients are above 06 for more than half models. The same model has different simulated capabilities for different extreme precipitation indexes. (3) The pattern correlation coefficient and root mean square error have good consistency, and the correlation coefficient of model ranking is larger than 04 HadGEM2CC,HadGEM2ES,MIROC4h,MIROC5, and CCSM4 are the best five global models. Compared to allmodal ensemble average, the bestmodel ensemble average can significantly reduce the wet deviation of simulation.

    參考文獻(xiàn)
    相似文獻(xiàn)
    引證文獻(xiàn)
引用本文

靳澤輝,苗峻峰,張永瑞,趙酉龍.華北地區(qū)極端降水變化特征及多模式模擬評(píng)估[J].氣象科技,2017,45(1):92~101

復(fù)制
分享
相關(guān)視頻

文章指標(biāo)
  • 點(diǎn)擊次數(shù):
  • 下載次數(shù):
  • HTML閱讀次數(shù):
  • 引用次數(shù):
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-01
  • 最后修改日期:2016-07-15
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發(fā)布日期: 2017-02-28
  • 出版日期:
文章二維碼
您是第位訪問(wèn)者
技術(shù)支持:北京勤云科技發(fā)展有限公司
曲靖市| 环江| 广水市| 景洪市| 迭部县| 新和县| 图木舒克市| 翼城县| 沙洋县| 固始县| 孙吴县| 新和县| 桐乡市| 咸阳市| 浠水县| 宁河县| 临朐县| 喀什市| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 滨海县| 英德市| 秀山| 东光县| 乐陵市| 香河县| 县级市| 贵州省| 勃利县| 石屏县| 柞水县| 长宁县| 凯里市| 运城市| 墨玉县| 大石桥市| 台中县| 鸡泽县| 涡阳县| 松阳县| 莱阳市| 通海县|